Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 79: 169-178, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30503653

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Although the association between systemic infection and cardiovascular events has been identified, uncertainty remains regarding the incidence and prognosis of sepsis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of sepsis on survival after first AMI. METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study involving the analysis of data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2000-2012, for patients with a primary diagnosis of first AMI. Among the 186112 prospective patients, sepsis was diagnosed in 13065 (7.0%). The propensity score matching technique was used to match 13065 controls to the patients with sepsis and AMI with similar baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards regression models, including sepsis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and comorbidities, were performed to further evaluate the different influences on the mortality risk in patients hospitalized for first AMI. RESULTS: Overall, the 12-year survival rate was lower in AMI patients with sepsis than in those without sepsis (log rank p-value <0.001); this was also shown in the different age and sex groups. The AMI patients with sepsis had a longer length of hospital stay than those without sepsis (32.5days vs. 11.74 days, p<0.001). In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, sepsis was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients after AMI (hazard ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.72-1.83). Interventional management with PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting improved survival in both the sepsis and non-sepsis patients after first AMI. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, sepsis significantly increased the mortality risk of patients after first AMI. PCI may improve the long-term survival of patients in comparison to those managed conservatively.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Prognóstico , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taiwan , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Front Neurol ; 9: 1003, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30538667

RESUMO

Background and Purpose: No previous study has compared the impact of dipyridamole-based triple antiplatelet therapy on secondary stroke prevention and long-term outcomes to that of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and previous stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of dipyridamole added to DAPT on stroke prevention and long-term outcomes in patients with cerebral infarction after first AMI. Methods: This nationwide, case-control study included 75,789 patients with cerebral infarction after first AMI. A 1:4 propensity score matching ratio was adopted based on multiple variables. Finally, the data of 4,468 patients included in the DAPT group and 1,117 patients included in the Dipyridamole-DAPT group were analyzed. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were cumulative event rate of recurrent MI or stroke, and cumulative intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding rate. Results: Long-term survival rate was comparable between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.1117), regardless of sex analyses. However, after first year, DAPT subgroup revealed better survival over DAPT-dipyridamole subgroup (log-rank P = 0.0188). In age subgroup analysis, a lower survival rate was detected in younger patients from the Dipyridamole-DAPT group after first year (log-rank P = 0.0151), but no survival difference for older patients. No benefit of Dipyridamole-DAPT was detected for patients after AMI, regardless of the myocardial infarction type. DAPT was superior to Dipyridamole-DAPT in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (log-rank P = 0.0153) and ST elevation myocardial infarction after first year (log-rank P = 0.0019). Dipyridamole-DAPT did not reduce cumulative event rate of recurrent MI or stroke in patients after AMI. Moreover, Dipyridamole-DAPT increased the cumulative ICH rate (log-rank P = 0.0026), but did not affect the cumulative event rate of gastrointestinal bleeding. In Cox analysis, dipyridamole did not improve long-term survival. Conclusions: This nationwide study showed that Dipyridamole-DAPT, compared with DAPT, did not improve long-term survival in patients with stroke after AMI, and was related to poor outcomes after 1 year. Dipyridamole-DAPT did not reduce recurrent rate of MI or stroke, but increased the ICH rate without impacting the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding.

3.
BMJ Open ; 8(1): e017412, 2018 01 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29374659

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the impact of HCV infection on 12-year mortality rates after AMI using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). METHODS: NHIRD data for approximately 23 000 000 patients between January 2000 and December 2012 were analysed. A total of 186 112 cases of first AMI admission were identified. A total of 4659 patients with HCV infection not receiving interferon therapy were enrolled and divided into those with (n=107) or without (n=4552) cirrhosis. Using one-to-one matching, 4552 matched controls were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: The 12-year mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with AMI with HCV infection and cirrhosis than in those with HCV infection but without cirrhosis (P<0.0001) or controls (P<0.0001). Patients with HCV infection but without cirrhosis had significantly higher long-term mortality rates than the matched controls (P<0.0001). The HR for mortality was higher in patients with HCV infection (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.18). HCV influenced outcomes among the subgroups of patients who were male (HR 1.15) and those who had hypertension (HR 1.14). CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection influenced the 12-year mortality rates of patients with AMI, especially those who were male and those who had hypertension. Cirrhosis further increased the long-term mortality rates of patients with AMI with HCV infection.


Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
4.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 16(1): 89, 2017 07 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28697774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies regarding the cardioprotective effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have not provided sufficient evidence of a relationship between DPP-4 inhibition and actual cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of DPP-4 inhibitors on the survival of diabetic patients after first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This was a nationwide, propensity score-matched, case-control study of 186,112 first AMI patients, 72,924 of whom had diabetes. A propensity score, one-to-one matching technique was used to match 2672 controls to 2672 patients in the DPP-4 inhibitor group for analysis. Controls were matched based on gender, age, and a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, end-stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and percutaneous coronary intervention. RESULTS: DPP-4 inhibitors improve the overall 3-year survival rate (log rank P < 0.0001), whether male or female. Cox proportional hazard regression showed DPP-4 inhibitor is beneficial in diabetes patients after AMI (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.95), especially in those patients with hypertension (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.97; P = 0.0103) and cerebrovascular disease (HR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.018), but without dyslipidemia (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.92; P = 0.0029), without peripheral vascular disease (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.96; P = 0.0047), without heart failure (HR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.96; P = 0.0106), without end stage renal disease (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.77-0.95; P = 0.0035), and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.97; P = 0.0096). CONCLUSIONS: DPP-4 inhibitor therapy improved long-term survival in diabetic patients after first AMI, regardless of gender.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...